Professional Network Visibility Surge: Women Find Success By Pretending as Men
Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?
Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.
The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility
Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.
Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.
Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up
The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.
Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.
Company Statement
In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.
Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.
Individual Results
Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.
"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.
Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.
The Process
- First, she modified her gender to "male"
- Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
- Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style
The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.
The Negative Aspect
Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.
"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."
She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."
Varying Outcomes
Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.
"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.
Broader Implications
These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.
Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.
System Details
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.
The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.
Changing Landscape
According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.
"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."